Solace

shorm:

bidyke:

the-queerdo-brigade:

todayiamadrian:

mudpiefactory:

dani-kin:

the-queerdo-brigade:

Rebloggable by request.

Links found in the original post:

• “Here is a good post by a bisexual person on pansexual people misdefining bisexuality.”
• “Here is a good post by a pansexual on problematic definitions of pansexuality.”
• “This and this are prime examples [of pansexual people claiming themselves as the breakers of the gender binary].”
• “See my previous posts on nonbinary people in nonmonosexual communities here, here, and here.”

THIS IS AMAZING.  YES.  THIS.

wow this expresses so many things that I could never quite process

What about pansexual people who don’t hate on bi people or mis-define bisexuality? What about pan people who aren’t ignorant towards trans* identities? What about pansexual people who have trans* identities? Why does every other post I see on pansexuality have these broad generalizations about what pansexual people say and think? 

Congratulations on the most roundabout version of “we’re not all like that” I’ve ever seen.

Nowhere did I say “all pan people.” I used cis and binary identity qualifiers where relevant. And by the way, binary trans*people perpetuate a lot of binarism and nonbinary erasure.

So what about all those pan people who “aren’t like that” that I didn’t talk about? What do you want, a pat on the back? A fruit basket with a card saying “congratulations on not personally being one of the people who misrepresent, appropriate, and generally shit on my identity”? I don’t owe you a fucking mention, not one.

OMG!

Okay both the original post and the later comment are pure gold.